CUbroadcast
  • Home
  • Episodes
  • Webinars
  • Knowledge Hub
  • StudioLounge
  • News
  • Careers
  • Supplier Central
  • Livecast
  • VideoTips
  • Subscribe
  • VideoServices
  • Sponsorships
  • About
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Home
  • Episodes
  • Webinars
  • Knowledge Hub
  • StudioLounge
  • News
  • Careers
  • Supplier Central
  • Livecast
  • VideoTips
  • Subscribe
  • VideoServices
  • Sponsorships
  • About
  • Contact
  • Blog

Co-Plaintiffs Commend NCUA Interim Final Rule Affirming Federal Credit Unions’ Power to Collect Interchange Fees

7/10/2026

0 Comments

 
Picture
In a comment letter filed Thursday, America’s Credit Unions, the Illinois Credit Union League, American Bankers Association, and Illinois Bankers Association offer strong support for the National Credit Union Administration’s (NCUA) interim final rule on preemption related to federal credit unions’ non-interest charges and fees.

The groups are plaintiffs in the lawsuit challenging the Illinois Interchange Fee Prohibition Act. In the letter, they argue that the rule makes clear:
  1. Preemption of state laws purporting to limit or affect the conditions of federal credit union loans and lines of credit is not limited to charges to members; and
  2. Federal credit unions enjoy broad authority to charge and receive non-interest charges and fees, including interchange fees for credit- and debit-card processing.

“Interchange fees compensate card issuers for the integral role they play in every credit and debit card transaction—maintaining accounts, extending credit, authorizing transactions, monitoring for fraud, and otherwise ensuring that the modern payment system functions. Collecting them is therefore an integral part of the provision of payment cards and card processing that the FCUA indisputably authorizes,” the letter reads.

The letter outlines how the NCUA’s interim final rule confirms that power, and how confirming preemption provides benefits to credit union members and the economy.

“If the IFPA were not preempted, compliance with that law would require sweeping changes to payment card systems… At the end of the day, those and other costs would ultimately be borne by consumers.”

The groups highlight several compliance and liability concerns, and the risk of a patchwork of state laws that would jeopardize national payment systems.

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.


    Archives

    August 2026
    July 2026
    June 2026
    May 2026
    April 2026
    March 2026
    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    November 2019
    February 2019
    December 2018
    September 2018
    May 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    August 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

CUbroadcast
Privacy Policy  •  Copyright © 2024 CUbroadcast