Two Executive Orders, One Housing Push: What It Means for Credit Unions

By Marc Rapport, Contributing Editor

​Trump orders aimed at easing mortgage lending and boost housing supply, but movement leaders say real impact will depend on how the details play out.

Key Points and Takeaways

• The March 13 orders take a dual approach: easing mortgage regulations while trying to increase housing supply.
• Credit unions see meaningful potential in reduced compliance burdens and operational flexibility.
• Local housing supply constraints and market conditions could well limit short-term impact.
• Industry response is cautiously optimistic, hinging on how the policies are implemented.

The White House has taken a two-pronged swing at one of the most persistent challenges in the economy, pairing efforts to expand mortgage credit with a parallel push to increase housing supply.

Taken together, the March 13 executive orders from President Donald Trump are aimed at making it easier to both build homes and finance them, a combination that credit unions have long argued is necessary to move the needle on affordability in a meaningful, lasting way.

Here are the White House’s “Fact Sheets” about each order:

• Affordable Home Construction
  Mortgage Credit Access

A Dual Approach to Housing Affordability
One order directs federal agencies to revisit rules that affect housing construction, including environmental reviews, energy standards, and historical preservation requirements. The goal is to reduce friction in the building process and encourage more supply, the White House says, particularly in markets where development timelines have stretched for years.

The second order targets mortgage lending, calling on regulators to simplify compliance for community-based institutions, modernize appraisal standards, and expand the use of digital mortgage tools that can reduce both cost and turnaround time.

According to reporting that places the two orders in their wider context, the construction-focused order also instructs federal leaders to develop best practices for state and local governments to align regulations with affordability goals, while the lending order pushes agencies to revisit policies that may be limiting community bank and credit union participation in mortgage markets.

Both actions sit within a broader policy effort to address housing affordability from multiple angles. The strategy reflects a willingness to combine regulatory relief, supply-side reforms, and financial system changes, even as some observers question how quickly those moves can translate into real gains for buyers facing high prices and limited inventory.

What It Means for Credit Unions
For credit unions, the mortgage-focused order hits directly at long-standing operational challenges.

James Akin

“These orders signal that the administration is attempting to take a holistic approach to easing the housing affordability crisis,” says James Akin, America’s Credit Unions’ head of regulatory advocacy. “The regulatory framework should support that goal rather than create barriers.”

Akin says the mortgage order touches “nearly every pain point our members have raised,” including capital treatment, exam practices, servicing burdens, and closing costs. If agencies “implement these directives faithfully,” he says, “credit unions will be able to put more resources into lending and less into compliance overhead that doesn't benefit borrowers.”
Some of the most immediate changes could come from updates to supervisory practices. The shift toward evaluating lenders based on outcomes rather than process, along with “correction-first treatment for good-faith errors,” could be implemented relatively quickly without full rulemaking, offering early relief, Akin says.

An NCUA spokesperson says, “We’re working to review and analyze the Executive Order to determine impact and scope of needed changes.”
 
Longer-term changes could be even more significant. The organization points to capital risk-weight reform, a broader qualified mortgage safe harbor, and higher HMDA reporting thresholds as measures that would “meaningfully reduce costs that are ultimately passed on to borrowers,” especially in smaller institutions.

At the same time, the group sees the supply-side order as a necessary complement, Akin says.

“Although credit unions don't build homes, they do finance them, and it's hard to make homeownership more accessible when there aren't enough homes to buy. We're encouraged by both,” says the ACU regulatory advocacy head.

On the Ground: Credit Union Perspectives
For individual credit unions, the reaction may be more measured and grounded in day-to-day realities.

---

Geoff Grimes

At Atomic Credit Union, SVP of Consumer Credit Geoff Grimes says the impact will depend on how the policies translate into local conditions.

The new executive orders could certainly impact certain aspects of mortgage lending but the actual effect “will largely depend on the specific provisions and how they influence local market conditions,” says Grimes, whose 87,000-member cooperative serves a wide swath of rural southern Ohio.

Grimes points to two areas that could make a real difference in operations at Atomic, which currently has a portfolio comprising 2,192 mortgages worth $231 million, making up 7% of the total loans at the $816 million credit union.

He says, “Appraisal modernization, including expanded use of alternative valuation models and clearer timelines,” and “digital mortgage modernization, such as e-signatures, e-notes, and remote online notarization,” both stand out as practical improvements.

The Atomic consumer lending executive also highlights ongoing pain points that many credit unions share. “HMDA reporting and TRID are the most burdensome,” Grimes says, noting that any effort to streamline those requirements “would be beneficial in reducing compliance obligations” and freeing up staff time for member service.

Still, broader market forces remain dominant. “Both limited housing supply and restricted access to credit are significant challenges,” he says, adding that local conditions, including interest rates and inventory, will continue to drive mortgage activity more than policy changes alone.

---

Tyler Grodi

At $6 billion Coastal Credit Union, CEO Tyler Grodi sees the orders as directionally positive, especially in fast-growing markets.

“These executive orders are a positive step toward addressing both housing supply and mortgage access,” he says, particularly in areas like the Research Triangle and elsewhere in North Carolina where demand continues to outpace supply.

Grodi says that on the mortgage side, the focus on improving efficiency and reducing unnecessary complexity is important for community‑based lenders.

“While these orders don’t create an immediate shift, they signal a more constructive environment for housing finance and point toward a healthier balance between supply and demand over the longer term,” who has been in the corner office at Coastal for the past three years.

What difference will it make day to day?

“If implemented, these changes would allow lenders to focus more of their time and resources on responsible underwriting and serving borrowers, rather than navigating technical compliance requirements,” says Grodi, whose 343,000-member cooperative holds a mortgage portfolio worth about $1.4 billion. “Importantly, this can be done without changing our commitment to safe, sound, and prudent lending.”

Military Lending and Broader Impact
For credit unions serving military communities, the potential benefits are clear but uneven, especially in the near term.

---

Anthony Hernandez

Anthony Hernandez, president and CEO of the Defense Credit Union Council, says the focus on reducing regulatory burden is “a positive step toward improving mortgage credit availability.” He notes that credit unions already play a critical role in serving servicemembers and veterans, particularly through VA loan programs and first-time homebuyer support.

“If compliance costs and administrative hurdles are lowered, credit unions may be able to process loans faster, offer more flexible underwriting, and reach more borrowers,” Hernandez says, including those with nontraditional financial profiles such as frequent relocations or variable income streams.

At the same time, Hernandez cautions that implementation will be key. “Actual impact will depend on how the policies are implemented and whether they specifically account for the unique structure and mission of credit unions,” he says, emphasizing that execution will determine real-world outcomes.

On the supply side, he expects slower results. “Increasing housing supply could very well help,” he says, but in high-demand areas near military bases, “it can take years for new inventory to come online,” which could limit immediate benefits.

Cautious Optimism Across the Movement
The response to these executive orders seems consistent: supportive, but cautious, with the understanding that policy intent does not always translate quickly into market outcomes.

The industry has been lobbying for many of these changes for years, particularly around regulatory burden and mortgage lending flexibility. These orders reflect movement in that direction and validate many of those concerns, but they are only a starting point.

A spokesperson for the world’s largest credit union, holder of $197 billion in assets and a loan portfolio of $143 billion encapsulates that notion: “As a member-owned financial institution, Navy Federal Credit Union supports responsible efforts that expand access to affordable mortgage credit while maintaining strong consumer protections and prudent underwriting standards.

“We’ll monitor how specific provisions may be implemented, and in the interim, continue to act in our members’ best interests.”

That balance, between access and protection, speed and oversight, will ultimately define whether these orders deliver on their promise. For credit unions, the opportunity is real, but so is the uncertainty, and the path forward will depend on how regulators turn broad directives into actionable rules.

---